Nazis, Fascists, Communists and the Political Spectrum

I seldom post on this blog, but I wanted to comment on this subject, after seeing a debate between Vox Day and Andrew Anglin as well as recent video on Fascism by Charles Coulombe. I want to cover the concept of the political spectrum, the concept of Fascism, and the Leftness of Marxist Leninism.

Left vs Right

The concept of Left Wing and Right Wing is dumb. nuff said...

Just kidding, but seriously it makes no real sense. Its defined in economic terms as Capitalism vs Socialism. If that were true every country prior to 1991 would be a radical Leftist country. Its defined as Enlightenment vs Anti-Enlightenment, but what does that even mean? Would that mean slavery is left wing? DEMS ARE THE REAL RACISTS! The best possible definition is essentially that Left is the belief in attempting to create universal human equality possible at any one point in time, and the Right is a negative definition of opposing achieving universal human equality or interchangeability  in any one area at any one time. In this definition, Right and Left is a completely arbitrary definition that can only be understood within history context. In American history then, in 1960 it was rejecting the equality of races in intellectual intelligence. In 1980, it was that women and men are different. In 2000, it was marriage having a coherent definition. Now its that citizenship as something than exists.  

Currently, then the Left in America is a force which wants to destroy any sense of American identity through the use Multinational Corporations. Any advocacy for Socialism is now de facto Right wing, because socialism if done for empowerment of one group over another is right wing, So workers solidarity is right wing because it opposes the lazy who depend upon welfare (often those who have more melanin). So Trump standing up for the workers and against multi-nationals is right wing, because right wing is a negative term which defines those who stand against the left wing at any one point in time. 

Fascism as a Historical Construct

There is no coherent definition of Fascism. The only meaningful definition is the colloquial definition which is: a holder of an opinion a self described leftist opposes. Because I have heard the following people be described as Fascists: Sun Yat-sen, Augusto Pinochet, Suharto, Ferdinand Marcos, Mohammad Rezā Pahlavi, Adolf Hitler, Margret Thatcher, Benito Mussolini, Benjamin Netanyahu, Plutarco Elías Calles, Donald Trump, Josip Broz Tito, Francisco Franco, and Hillary Clinton. In that sense its everybody and their dog, and their dog's dog. In the University system its a lump all term for any states which can be associated with Nazi Germany which existed in the 1930s/40s in Europe. The most honest and coherent definition would be a political system with a centralized single party state which has a mixed economy which leans towards socialism and is very nationalist in both ideology and practice. So by that definition the bad guys from WW2 as well as Baathists would be Fascist. Now obviously, Fascism as it now exists is an inherently pejorative term, but a nationalist single party state with a corporatism model of socialism seems to be a workable definition. 

Nazism/National Socialism 

I don't like Hitler, and I don't like German National Socialism or Nazism. We are told that it is the Platonic Form of Evil, and it was bad for sure, but it is one bad regime among many in the vast annuals of history. Something that is often forgotten though is that Historical Nazism was extremely pragmatic. They never constructed a constitution, but used the Weimar constitution in emergency powers mode the whole time. Their ideology considered Russians subhuman, and allied with the South Slavs. Hitler hated the French and admired Muslim Arabs. Their whole ideology was one of convenience, and is completely incoherent. At one point they had a heavy contingent of  Command Economists holding prominent positions, who were fucking decimated, by the way, when it became apparent that ruling the country would work better if they had support from industrial capitalists and they settled on a mixed market. Nazism is now associated with anything right wing by self proclaimed leftists, but is now integrally connected to both Pan-White Racial Nationalism.  This is all the fault of one man.

 

George Lincoln Rockwell created a Pan-White Racial Nationalist movement in the United States associated with Nazism for shock power. His movement was basically a parody of the American Black Civil Rights movement happening simultaneously. He was succeeded by William Luther Pierce who continued the movement through the collapse of Southern resistance to the rise of Black poltical power.  This meant that all Pan-White Racial Nationalism would become associated with this movement. This movement begin calling itself White Nationalism and is and was extremely working class. As such it grows though disaffected whites with average or slightly below average intelligence and was not really interested in its image. As such, in the popular mindset Nazism is associated with this movement, and this movement has nothing to do with it. This is a horrible thing for two reasons. 1. The real Nazis were not Pan White Nationalists at all, and were Nordicists who didn't care about the White Race and European civilization. 2. This means that the war crimes of the Nazis in the Second World War are now due to Pan White Nationalism in the normies mind. Well I don't think that its necessary to constantly distance yourself from Nazism from a broken record. Its retarded that if you think that America should remain a White majority nation that in the minds of normies that equals wantonly destroying Polish and Czech towns, and I have as much sympathies for the Nazis that I do for the Soviets. 

Italian Fascism 

The catch all term of Fascism receives its name from a group of Italians who predated the Nazis. The Italian Fascists were far different then their Nazi counterparts. The Germans were ethnic nationalists, while the Italians were Civic Nationalists who accepted Jews. Don't believe me? Then check out the American Black Shirts. True Fascism was much more grounded than its German counterpart, and talked little of Hyperboreans and Aryans, yet far less pragmatic. The Italian system had more to its ideology, being a Nationalist form of Revolutionary Socialism in the understanding of a Corporatist economic system. This was the system which the other so called Fascist parties base themselves, as it was far more thought out as an ideology. 

Francoism and the Falange 

The third prominent example of Fascism given is always Spain under Franco. While the Falange were similar to the Italian Fascists. They again were not nordicists like the Nazis but Catholic civic Nationalists, and just wanted the Jews to convert to Catholicism and be Spanish... (The historical answer to the Jewish question). It is often forgotten that the Falange were just one supporter of the cause of the Nationalist in the Civil War among many. Once Franco took power, he gradually distanced himself from the Falange, especially after their brand of Socialism failed...  (A brand of Socialism which is doubled in no true Scotsmanship, because the self declared Left likes to play lip service to socialism, and because it failed).

One thing you notice is that the Italians were the ones people ripped off and the Germans were the outliers. Secondly there are technically only 4 Fascist parties to take power without being imposed by outside powers being Italy, Germany, Greece and Romania. And Greece was an allied power in the war...

Marxism Leninism in Power

  

So you have a country which is an imperialist power annexing numerous states and making many others its puppet states. It aggressively tries to destroy the national identities of its minorities by promoting the culture of the ethnic majority. Its official doctrine is that only the educated elite can effectively rule a country, while simultaneously advocating for the working class. It supports traditional gender roles while claiming to empower women, and aggressively enforces anti-sodomy laws. Well that's the Soviet Union post Lenin.  Almost to a man, every Marxist Leninist nation was far to the "right" on every issue except many were Anti-religious thing.Yet almost every person you meet on the street who claims to be a commie is a fucking filthy animal. Basically Revolutionary Socialism as a movement which developed in the aftermath of the French Revolution and 1848 and is effectively dead post 1991 was a Millennialist pseudo religious idea. It's completely feels over reals. Anarchist, Left Communists, and Trotskyist essentially believe that magic will just happen and a revolution will spontaneously over take the world. There is truth to the no true Scotsman of real Communism has never been tried, and because real communism is completely impossible. While the people which are self identified leftists today were for the most part made up communists in Europe back in the day as soon as they took power none of their ideas worked. If you look at Soviet History rather closely they tried all these stupid Weimar  internationalist and free love bullshit and it failed then Stalin obliterated all that horseshit.

Also keep in mind there has always been working class guys who don't wanna deal with that stupid Capitalist bullshit. These guys had no tolerance for faggotary, and that is who Stalin supported and what almost every Communist country was like. So that means that under the meaningful definition of right vs left now Communism is right wing... And in the current historical context it is! Also once Stalin effectively industrialized Russia in lighting speed on the top of a mounds of bodies Communism became a worldwide movement for modernization and industrialization. Asian, African, and Middle Eastern communists while not nice guys don't like faggy bullshit at all.

So to reiterate Right wing can only exist in opposition to those who consider themselves to be Left. The Left is those who want to create the most possible equality or even interchangeability of peoples as possible and thus go against both the laws of nature and God.   

Thoughts on White guys with Asian girls on the Far Right.

Every once and a while I look at the blog The Half Asian Reality which is an Anti-White/Asian miscegenation blog and feel some form of disgust both at our society and for him. The blog is written by a dysfunctional Happa man who is half White American and half Hong Konger. The blog is noted for its extreme misogynistic tendencies towards Asian women, politically correct self righteous condemnation of his father's Far Right politics and the thinly veiled anger of the writer for not being full White . I have never spoken with the writer of the blog, but from reading it I think that the writer has inherited mental illness and that his problems come from this primarly and not from his racial composition. Something else worth noting is that the writer constantly says that his parent's marriage was a disaster because of the miscegenation, but the decline of marriage in the United States is so severe that his parents marriage is actually better than most current White on White marriages.

I am going to get in trouble with my friends and allies on the right here for this post, and called an IQ Nationalist, but I don't think miscegenation is Evil. I don't think it is good, because I on believe it does make a marriage less stable, but its not Evil. Furthermore I think it makes sense in the society we created (more on that later).

I live and grew up in a Red Mountain state. My mother is very racist and has a deep dislike of other races, especially of East Asians and American Indians. I have watched Godzilla movies since I was a child and when I became a teenager I became a fan of J horror and Anime. I think Asian girls are cute, no more so than White girls (no less though too). All of the Happa men I have ever met in real life are/were stable and they were the products of White male Asian females couples. The only one I ever met that was unstable was a half Japanese girl who disliked being half White because she had imbued modern identity politics and suffered from White guilt. I think that mental health problems are greatly exacerbated by environment, and I think urban multicultural society decimates mental health. This is part of Western Society where Happas live. Almost every person that is pure White that I have talked to over the internet who is from an urban multicultural city suffers from some form of mental illness or the other. Most of the people from more rural/mono cultural societies are by an unwritten rule more healthy. I mean race mixing kinda anticipates multiculturalism, but it seems multiculturalism is the problem here and the genes are the lesser one.

As far as racemixing goes I think that when you have a society like the United States it becomes almost the rational choice. If you look at miscegenation, its that personality types are more of a determiner of choice of sexual partner over and above race. So when you look at White men going for Asian girls what you notice is that they have similar personality in so far as they are both introverted and are very K type aka have few sexual partners. I don't think there really is a Asian fetishism going on as The Half Asian Reality would say as in White members of the Far Right who have some kind of complex for Asian girls, and Asian girls who have some sexual complex for White guys (for the most part). Its in fact that humans breed primarily on similar personalities ie Introversion/Extroversion and K type/R type (few vs many sexual partners) as its the the best natural predictor of compatibility. If 20% of White men are very introverted and 60% of Asian girls then you end up with a divide which favors miscegenation. The same thing will happen with R type white women being a smaller proportion with R type minorities be they Black or Hispanic. In a multicultural society you would expect there to be an incentive for the ends of personality spectrum of the dominant party to breed with the ends of the other minorities along the personality spectrum. In my personal life I have seen more introverted Latina women and American Indian women miscegenate with introverted White men and vice versa along the lines of race, gender, and personality type. In a secular society with a liberated sexuality you tend to see the K type/R type rule breeding rule to apply regardless of ideology. Very Ideologically pro sexual liberation people when they are K types act like K types. You can see with this with Introverted left wing White males go for Asian females at the same rate. Its not that the Far Right likes Asians because they aren't feminist or something its because they both are K types and are more compatible with each other. Conversely in a liberalized sexual society those who are R type even if they are far right/religious often behave like a R type regardless. Sexual mores of a society controls of the sexuality of the common man and woman, but has little effect on the introverts as they are naturally K no matter what.

*Keep in mind that IQ and K/R type are not identical even if they often over lap. There are sexual bohemians who have very high IQs and low IQ people who are very loyal.

 *I'm not endorsing miscegenation I am only stating from my understanding of Rushton's work applies to behavior patterns within Multicultural societies and can even explain miscegenation patterns within them.

*I think sexual mores determine the sexual behavior of a society far greater than most race realists believe (conversely I don't want to downsize the role of genetics as they are extremely important). Germany and Sweden are far more promiscuous than India and the Philippines despite an IQ gap of about 15 points. In fact I expect that sexual behavior is a greater predictor of societal stability and possibly even economic success when applied over decades on the macro level.

*its very possible that women during the initial stages of a relationship even if they are introverted prefer a extrovert (confident is a much better word), and then stick with one who is introverted if they are introverted. Maybe White men who are introverted can go into a extroverted mode more readily than Asian men do, and there for can attract Asian women at a higher rate.

Thoughts on what is the Alt-Right and its Crisis

Well Trump won...



I have not written anything sense endorsing him. Now it is 2017, and the "Alt-Right" movement is falling apart. But before we get into that I want to explain my view of the "Alt-Right," and what it is exactly.

The Alt-Right is basically a term created by Richard Spencer to provide a synonym for White Nationalism with less baggage. It has since evolved into a catch all term for everything right to the mainstream positions of National Review and the Beltway. I will list out the groups that I see as part of the Alt-Right catch all.

Old-School White Nationalism

This is obviously an old movement which can trace its lineage to the aftermath of the fall of Jim Crow and the implementation of the Hart-Celler Act and the conception of America as a White Nation before those landmark changes. It is defined by its working class attitude, and because of that it has always been painted as being for dim wits and fools. Because of its more down to Earth style many of its proponents have larped dressing in Nazi garb, inventing their own religions, and the obligatory White Sheets. Other than those sheets there is no tradition of hiding one's face. Older figures which were part of this movement were of course George Lincoln Rockwell, William Luther Pierce, Harold Covington, and David Duke. Younger proponents are, of course, Andrew Anglin and Matthew Heimbach. The movement is interesting in that it is for the most part an ethnic nationalist movement with very little Logos arguments and much Pathos arguments regarding protecting one's heritage or for the love of one's people as an entity in and of themselves.

Paleo-Conservatism/Race Realism

   This is one of the more loosely defined movements, but I would say is its defining element is the appeal to Logos over Pathos particularly in the areas of Race and IQ and Crime Statistics. For this it uses the work of renegade scientists such as Phillip Rushton, or Richard Lynn. The other common outlying theme is that many of these people were once part of the mainstream Republican establishment but were forced out as the Overton Window marched "leftward." They are often viewed by the left as the KKK with suits and ties. This is because they are often highly educated and incredibly intelligent, because of this they have a very analytical understanding which can influence very intelligent outsiders who are fine with accepting heterodox views. Due to their intellectualism they have little mass appeal because they lack the working class spirit of old school White Nationalism or a coherent identity such as Ethno-nationalism or Religious "fundamentalism." Prominent examples include Jared Taylor, Peter Brimelow, Sam Francis, John Derbyshire, and arguably Richard Spencer.

  Throne and Altar Christianity 

The worldview of Traditional forms of Christianity is fundamentally incompatible with the modern world and as such it is a radical political ideology in its own right. The blogger himself identifies with the positions outlined by the worldview. It incorporates Traditional Catholicism, as well as Eastern Orthodoxy, Anglo-Catholcism and Confessional Lutherans. The worldview has very strong tendencies towards hierarchy, anti-multiculturalism, as well as Antisemitism, but as a universal religion is noticeably anti-Racialist. The most substantial defining feature of it politically is its resolute rejection of the Sexual Revolution and the destruction of the Family. A position often at odds with many members of the "Core Alt Right" and "Alt Light". Ironically in countries such as Canada, Homosexuals have become the most powerful and protected of minorities and opposition to their lifestyles is the highest desecration of their civic religion. Prominent figures influential to the "Alt Right" movement  are E. Michael Jones, (more and more) Davis Aurini,  and arguably Common Filth (even if he is a low Church protestant).

Neo-Reactionaries

 Once seen as a much larger movement Neo-Reactionaries have declined to a degree. It is defined by viewing the world as a deterministic natural system. It is perhaps the most intellectual and esoteric of the world views but also overwhelming pessimistic as it sees the collapse of Western Civilization and in some causes human extinction as a given. It is also very bizarre and eclectic drawing equally from Throne and Altar Christian movement's counter enlightenment (ideas which they label as the "Dark Enlightenment"), Race Realism, Anarcho Primitivism, and Technocratic Futurism. It will never have any real appeal to the mainstream because its too far out there, its so far out there that to a certain extent it becomes irrelevant to the Overton Window and outside of the Right/Left Paradigm.
Proponents include Mencius Moldbug, and Nick Land.

MRA's and MGTOW

This is a movement while important I have very little stomach for as a Christian, so forgive me if its kinda a rough and unsympathetic summery. Basically many Millennial men feel abandoned by the modern West and particularly their ideals of masculinity and relationship with women. Rejecting the modern faggotary of the nu male and the bullshit of modern women, they attempt to become Alpha men who can control the world around them. A major website in those circles is The Return of Kings.

Alt-Lite

The so called "Alt-Lite" is movement of Civic Nationalism which supports Trump. It its values are Traditional Liberalism minus identity politics. That's it... It appeals to the lowest common denominator, the normie menace. Its main goal is getting normie millennials free of harassment from identity politics and allowing them to identify with the America they were taught in 4th grade civics class. The I have a Dream America.  As such they are dedicated to fighting SJW's, and began as a movement with Gamergate and have grown larger from there. Members include Paul Joseph Watson, Lauren Southern, Shoeonthehead, Sargon of Akkad, and Milo.

The Core Alt-Right

The Core Alt Right or the True Alt Right is a collection of Libertarians who due to the Racial Politics of Obama era America began to take on elements of Paleo Conservatism and White Nationalism. One of the main echo chambers that lead to its creation was the Libertarian/Anarcho Capitalist YouTube community. One poster and (probable my personal favorite vlogger of all time) Ryan Faulk accepted the race realist arguments and began to post videos about Hereditarianism at the same time that he posted videos about how paying taxes sucks. What happened was a firestorm as Ryan's channel Fringeelements changed the positions of Spawktalk, Laughingman OX, Black Acid Lizard, and most famously Morrakiu. As a result the online the Anarcho-Capitalist community during Obama's second term fractured with many taking up many elements of Race realism and White Nationalism. One former libertarian blogging site in particular called the The Right Stuff took off, because of its podcast the Daily Shoah. The comedic nature of the podcast allowed its fanbase to boom and as a result many of the running gags and jokes of the show became memes in the Chan subculture of the internet. The popularity of the podcast allowed many other podcasts to take off mostly notably Fash the Nation. The "True Alt Right" uses the visuals and extremism of Traditional White Nationalism but its talking points are much more similar to the Paleo Conservatives/ Race Realists. Following Trump's victory, the True Alt-Right began to attack the so called Alt-Lite for its name recognition or at least to gain views from the controversy. In a few weeks following that many prominent members who kept their identity secret where Doxxed. 

The fate of the Alt Right

This brings the story full circle. In the past week of the writing of this article many members of the podcast The Daily Shoah have been doxxed as well as vlogger Millennial Woes. In particular the owner of the TRS website Michael Peinovich has been doxxed reveling that his wife was Jewish (a fact that I knew at least year prior to the incident). This has left the Core Alt Right future as very unsure. It has lead to the collapse of the popular meme page Counter Signal Memes for Fashy Goys, as well as the podcast Fash the Nation. Many of my friends have said the Alt-Right is finished. If you define the Alt Right as the website TRS well then sure. But I think that factors leading to White People shifting the Overton Window are a deterministic result of nature. Simply put the coming race war in the United States is baked in the cake because of racial identity politics, and TRS only served as an outlet. The outlet will just shift to other figures. I think that as long as free speech remains the same in the United States Traditional White Nationalism and Paleo Conservatism will grow as their prominent spokesmen are always liable to show their face. Maybe they will grow because there was less of a generational gap between the Millenials and the leaders of the True Alt Right, but society will force them to grow. For the Alt-Lite who knows. The Neo Reactionaries are basically a non starter because of their bizarreness (which I do love).  MRA's will always have an audience as long as young men are rejected by modern women. If God is real then the Throne and Altar's will triumph even it takes the whole time of created existence,

-Chief Inquisitor 

   

An Endorsement of Donald Trump or something like that.

In my life as a Millennial, I have lived through three presidencies those being Bill Clinton's, George Bush Jr's., and Barrack Obama's. At the beginning of this period the world seemed to be entering an age of unparalleled peace and prosperity. The United States was the unmatched Super Power who had triumphed from a 46 year long unofficial war of attrition with the Soviet Union to create a world which it could shape at its will. Never before had a single nation had so much power as the United States had had in the early 90's. Many believed that America had ushered in an Pax Americana where the Anglosphere cultural model would expand and usher in its civil freedoms and prosperity across the globe, Francis Fukuyama's so called End of History. This of course did not come to pass as it was impossible. The wealth, prosperity and freedom seen within the United States, Great Britain, and rest of the Anglosphere countries is cultural and bound within the people and history of those nations. For numerous reasons you cannot transform Russia, Somalia, or Iraq into New Zealand. You cannot create peace by molding other nations into the United States through cultural erosion. This era of peace quickly faded into obscurity into the world and America you see today. It goes without saying that these last three presidents have been horrible and incompetent in such an aggressive way as to pull America back from its strength it had at the beginning of the 90's into a state which boarders on terminal decline.

The Man Slut President 1993-2001

To the uninitiated, Bill Clinton seems to have been a decent president who guided the country well, but was untested by the major problems which would create a great or terrible president when facing them. While Clinton did do some good in addressing rising crime and helping further the decline in violent crime initiated by the Drug War, (the so called racist system where intercity blacks are held to the same standards as whites) he would hurt America more then help it. Bill Clinton was more than any other president responsible for the rise of Globalism, Neo-Liberalism, and the decline of the American workforce. Bill Clinton signed into law and championed NAFTA, and the most favored trading partner status with the Chinese. While Reagan and Bush had begun Neo-Liberalism, Clinton put it on steroids and paved the way for the rapid deindustrialization of the Untied States which not just tears the jobs away from hard working Americans, destroys communities, and causes poverty, but makes the United States weak and a slave to the whims of the Globalist world plan. Clinton also oversaw the vast deregularization of  Wall Street and banking industry an act which would enable the usury which blossomed into the finical collapse of 2008/2009, from which the world is yet to recover. Clinton also continued the Cold War insanity of the American Empire despite the absence of the Soviet Union. These Foriegn wars serve little purpose for the American people, and in fact are counter to their interests as they create blowback (9/11), strengthens the globalist economy, ruins the lives people of other nations, grows the debt of the United States, and generally makes the world unsafer. In his private life Clinton has been notoriously surrounded by immense controversy as the most corrupt president in American history. The Clinton's have been of course involved in insider trading (Cattle Future Trading Scandal), Pyramid schemes (White Water Scandal), and the destruction of incriminating files (Filegate & Email Scandal). Clinton had the Monica Lewinsky scandal, but has been involved in numerous others surrounding around his sexual escapades including the most recent one involving likely pedophilia in the Lolita Express scandal. Most shocking of these scandals, are conspiratorial in nature, the death of White House Consul Vince Foster, and the possible high treason of trading secrets to the People's Republic of China for Campaign Contributions.

The Legacy President 2001-2009

I doubt George Bush II was as stupid as the left wing media made him out to be, but there is little doubt in one thing, everything he has in life was given to him by the power of his father. That being said the failures of the second Bush have been spoken from the highs of the mountain tops by the Liberal media so addressing them hear is some what redundant. That being said he reigned when the economic seeds laid by Clinton blossomed in the chaos which was the so called Great Recession. His intervention in the Great Recession and tax cuts without spending cuts greatly increased the debt burden of the federal government. The greatest failure of Bush's presidency was without a doubt the Invasion of Iraq. Iraq cannot be reshaped into Canada over night, this is obvious. The threat of Iraq as the future perpetrator of a 9/11 like attack with Weapons of Mass Destruction was of course ludicrous. The fruits of the Iraq war would not come into full spring until the presidency of his successor. 

The Affirmative Action President 2009-2016   

Obama's young life is shrouded in mystery and has prompted the Birther conspiracy theory movement. My guess for Obama's murky past is that it revels something not as sinister as being the illegitimate child of a communist or a closet Muslim, but something embarrassing. The embarrassing fact is that Obama is essentially an Affirmative Action president propelled forward by the Chicago political machine. Obama is an incompetent and petty man whose failures are greater than his predecessors. This has been obscured by the liberal media painting him in a much more favorable light than Bush. Obama has turned the Iraq war and foreign policy he inherited from Bush into something worse than a terrible war, he has turned it into a civilizational crisis. The interventions into Iraq, Syria, and Libya have created the Migrant Crisis something which threatens to destabilize the whole of Europe. Obama is a politically correct coward who cannot even call ISIS by its name the Islamic State. He has of course continued the failed economic polices of his predecessors which benefits only the Globalist elite, and puts the immense burden of ever increasing debt upon the average American. Obama has also helped in reigniting racial disharmony by stating that the thug Treyvon Martin could have been his son. In doing so he has tarnished the Oval Office even more than Bill Clinton did by not being the President of the nation at large (at least publicly) but the president of his ethnic group. Obama is further tarnishing the presidency by campaigning against Donald Trump as a sitting president something which is outside of established norms in American politics.

Hilldawg Rising   ?2016-2020/2024¿       

   Hilldawg is Death. Hilldawg is Chaos. Hilldawg is Decline. 

Hillary brings the culmination of the last few presidencies to a crescendo, the transition from stagnation into decline unto collapse.  With the passing the 1965 Immigration act the demographics of the United States have been damaged by the mass inflow of non-European immigration. This Immigration brings with it an increase in crime, social alienation, and  easy victories for the Democratic party which uses the promise of welfare to bribe these immigrants into electing them. Hillary Clinton offers the most radical immigration policy in American history if not world history. What little stands in the way of Central American immigration now will be abolished and amnesity will be given away to all. The Republican party will never be able to acquire the White House ever again, and the United States will be transformed into a single party state. The Southwest will be populated with Central American migrants so fast that a urban conflict will likely develop resembling The Troubles in Northern Ireland with Mexican first and second immigrants using urban terrorism in an attempt to force the United States ceding the Southwest to Mexico. Hillary will also dump Muslims migrants all over America enabling mass rape and terrorism which is being seen in Europe. 

Hillary will continue the Globalist Economics of her husband and predecessors which will strip away jobs and make America a slave to the globalist game plan. She will continue the astronomic spending of the welfare system and possibly increase it leading to higher and higher levels of debt aided by increased taxes on corporations pushing America even further right on the Laffer Curve putting the nation into a unrecoverable economic position. This position will cause a chain of events which will usher in a never ending trap leading to the defaulting of the United States Federal Governments's debt. Once the United States defaults from its debt it will become completely incapable of recovering because it will have no manufacturing base from which to base its recovery from. After all what happens to nation which is an import dependent economy when it can no longer buy those imports? 

In the immediate future Hillary would fight the wars for Israel in the most haphazard way imaginable she is after all a hawk and the Neo-Cons are jumping the GOP ship for her. She has shown herself to be incredibly inept in foreign affairs as evidenced by Benghazi and the Libya in general. My guess is that once the United States enters an Economic meltdown the armed forces will be drastically cutback. This cutback will actualized as a rapid withdrawal from the immense number of overseas bases the Untied States currently has. This withdrawal will greatly destabilize East Asia, the Middle East, and Europe leading to a power vacuum.

The most important and powerful branch of the American Government is the Supreme Court. Originally, I supported Cruz over Trump due to the immense importance of Supreme Court Justice appointments as Cruz seemed more trustworthy in this department then Trump during the heat of the primaries. That point aside. If Hillary wins we have a 5/9 Liberal Court which will vote for Pozz on day one. In the next 4 to 8 years Kennedy, Ginsburg, and Breyer are likely to die leaving Hillary a 6/9 court, and conversely Trump a 7/9 court. Of Course, as I predicted above a second Clinton presidency would result in a single party state meaning that the Supreme Court would be permanently lost. With a court permanently lost to the cult of Dildotech, the social ills allowed to destroy the nation will move beyond Aberrosexuality and Abortion into the Abolition of the First and Second amendments. I believe the order of rights lost will be such: Religious Schools and Hospitals as well as Homeschooling will abolished, Followed by Tax Exemption (once Tax Exemption is revoked this will mean the Federal Government will shut down Churches at will as the IRS will be able to persecute Church Leaders just as it persecuted David Duke and the Tea Party movement), then the next will be hate speech and Holocaust Denial laws, ending with the gradual erosion of the Second Amendment.

I don't understand why RamzPaul is laughing about the possible growth of the "Alt-Right" in the above video. Doesn't he realize that a Clinton Presidency means that he will go to Prison? What use does the (((SPLC))) have other than providing a list for a purge on the day the First Amendment gets white outed from the Constitution? I could see the whole hate list of the (((SPLC))) from Don Black to Michael Matt being fined or imprisoned. 

Trump the man 

Sorry to pop your bubble, but Trump is not an angel or the best choice for president for social conservatives/paleo-conservatives. Trump's commitment to Social Conservatism is likely nothing less than skin deep as he has changed his party 5 times. In fact Trump once ran for president in 2000 under the Reform party. Its very likely that Trump has not converted to Conservative values, and is simply fanning them to get elected. What does this mean? Well if Trump wins the Republican Party could abandon Social Conservatism, and this is why originally I supported Cruz over and above Trump, but Trump has since stated his possible Supreme Court picks which are quite good and he seems that he will compromise here to be elected on the Republican ticket. If you look at Trump's run under the Reform party you see that Trump has not changed on a lot of issues most notably Protectionism and Immigration sanity. I think that Mr. Trump has quite wisely chosen the Republican Party to advance his goals as the Republican Party's primary was less rigged than the Democratic's Party's as well as the Republican constituency to more openness to outsiders and lied or fanned Conservatism and Christianity in order to be succeed in the party's primary.

 While I doubt it it is possible that Trump is truly an egomaniac who wants to be elected simply for the glory of the White House. (This does seem unlikely as Trump has lost a great deal by running.) Which brings another downside to Trump in that his presidency has become vehicle for the increasing vulgarness of social discourse. Trump was a Reality TV star and in his speeches he talks in the manner of a Reality TV star, vulgar and blunt. Trump symbolizes the decline of the United States and resembles ironically a Latin American politician in the image he has made for himself. This image is a flamboyant tough guy who speaks in the manner of the average man. Trump does not pose himself as a man of integrity, intelligence, or of the Church but as a commodity for the lowest common denominator.

Trump is also not a good man under the standards of Catholic Church. Trump has committed adultery and bragged about it, and has used his wealth and power in order to marry women much younger than him who are models. He is unrepentant for his sins and is immensely ignorant of Christianity and lies about his faith in such a transparent matter that any Christmas and Easter Christian with an IQ above 75 can see it. He has gone bankrupt 3 times and is entangled with Trump University case. There are even allegations that he has connections with the Mob. He could have even cheated on his taxes too!!! 

Trump could also be a paper tiger. People forget that he is a complete greenhorn in politics and has never held public office. He also faces something which almost any politician would perceive as a nightmare, his own party does not support him. Much of the establishment is still backbiting him now at the point when it is suicide to do so, and one can only imagine what would happen if he is incompetent upon entering office and the whole of the Republican Party abandons him leaving completely in the cold. He also faces the difficulty of running against Hillary's massive industry of financial support with the commitment not to use big business/Wallstreet campaign money. As well as picking a VP candidate who not just support the establishment in the event of assassination or impeachment. Trump still faces an electoral college biased towards Hillary, and the high possibility of voter fraud as seen in Austria. His trading polices could preemptively trigger the economic collapse discussed above as well leading to a very low approval rate which would resemble that of Boris Yeltsin.  

The Last Hope

 

         

All this being said Trump is the only hope we have. He is the last thing standing in the way of America's epitaph. We have no choice, but to support him. He polices on trade, immigration, and foreign affairs will truly benefit America First. He has also punched Overton Window so hard in his stumpings that he is legitimately opening the door for public discourse to include Heresy. Jared Taylor is getting on TV again fam!!! He has crushed the Neo-Cons and pushing the remainder of the Jews into the Democratic party, and is reshaping the Republican party with a vast social movement into a party which supports American independence and Populism. Even if he does fail in the most miserable way imaginable he will hopefully leave us with two legacies one a 7/9 Supreme Court and two a wall on the boarder which cannot not be unbuilt.  

Look to the Skies, and See the Trumpian Rise

- Serp Kerp 

Assumptions

I have heard that Conservatives have the tendency to like or do the same things over and over again. For example they will watch the same films over and over, stay loyal to a single band for decades, or eat at the same restaurant repeatedly. I know that this is certainly true of myself as I watch David Lynch's Dune like a dozen times a year, and play hundreds of hours of Paradox interactive games. Liberals in contrast supposedly tend to be much more exploratory and constantly trying something new. Maybe this is where the meme of an old boring fuddy duddy originates. I have noticed that the more Red pilled I became my assumptions matched reality. I know that confirmation bias is a powerful drug that's entirety subjective, but it seemed lefty Serp had a higher error in his predictions then righty Serp now does. I wonder if liberals like to be surprised by always being wrong.

But anyway to the main point, being an evil, racist, Nazi SOB I find myself making an assumption and then researching the point only to be greatly surprised by the immense accuracy of that assumption. Case in point, earlier I was scrolling down the Facebook when I saw a video of a plastic wheel barrow in Africa used for transporting water. This wheel barrow is the Hippo water roller.

The Hippo water roller is a wheel barrow with a large plastic barrel of water as a wheel. The roller allows women and children in Sub Saharan Africa transporting water from rivers and lakes to their homes to carry much more water faster then they would of had carrying it the traditional way, on the head. Upon watching this video my immediate reaction was to assume that whites in the west invented this. I immediately looked the Hippo roller up on google to check, and to my non-surprise it was in fact made by whites. Two Boers in South Africa, Pettie Petzer and Johan Jonker, as a matter of fact. The comment actually made me feel guilty as if I was picking on a retard. Some commentators said "hey guess what Africans have finally invented the wheel" my assumption was even edger "hey look some whites invented the wheel for the Africans".

Besides the sobering fact that whites who come up with the simplest of ideas are doing more for Africa then Sub-Saharans are doing for themselves is the jarring nature of your own confirmation bias. Its just mind boggling. There is of course the aids to checking out your assumptions such as the cleverly named  Coincidence Detector which highlights Jewish Surnames in HTML.
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/coincidence-detector/hldnghbakgkgeocjllocmpobpppkfepo?hl=en-US

Once you download that app and check out the Neo-Conservative or Trotskyist Wikipedia pages and see assumption after assumption confirmed its only nature to wonder how is the normal guy not smart enough to get this. How is the average man not able to just simply not notice what's right in front of his face? Why do Liberals masquerade as the intelligent ones when every assumption and every prediction they have ever made is wrong?

A great example of a liberal being monumentally wrong is the video of the Amazing Atheist examining the Five Proofs of the existence of God of Saint Thomas Aquinas.



            

The immense hubris at work here is mind boggling. The Amazing Atheist, who happens to be a high school dropout, believes that he has thoroughly debunked Saint Thomas Aquinas within a 15 minute youtube video. Anyone who has a glimmer of an understanding of Saint Thomas, Aristotle, or Scholasticism at large can see almost immediately that the Amazing Atheist has absolutely no idea of what he is talking about. He is so ignorant of the topic that he is unable to understand the fourth proof or The Argument from Degree in any detail. He simply does not even know what a Universal is. Yet he was so confident of his own intelligence that he made this video and is or at least was probably proud of it (its still hosted upon his official account and not mirrored). He did not even think to look up or read any basic introduction to Saint Thomas's work in a philosophical encyclopedia book, it seems he just free balled it.

I think it becomes clearly evident when watching this video that liberals have a low understanding of what the right actually believes and why. They have so much disdain for the right they look upon understanding it as literally below them. A good example of this is the following video by Peace House.

        

The presenters make immense errors upon the policies of Donald Trump which could have been easily fixed by the fifteen minutes which it takes to read the Wikipedia page of Donald Trump. Yet they make these errors because they refuse to understand the policies Trump wants because that is beneath them, the enlightened progressives. To them Trump is an evil capitalist who simply is exploiting the hatred of stupid rednecks. Nothing more, nothing less. The leftist inability to understand the right as well the narrowness of their moral compass is examined in depth in the Righteous Mind by Jonathan Haidt.

My hypothesis is that most outspoken liberals have average to moderately above average intelligence and gravitate towards opinions which have high prestige. The ideas which have high prestige are of course the ideas of the ruling class which in the modern Occident is the ideology of Progressive Globalism and the universal equality of all human beings. These people of middle level intelligence then out of the desire to look intelligent and fit into society become liberals. The high status that teachers in high schools and universities as well as the media and celebrities which are overwhelmingly liberal doesn't help this trend either.

   

Conversely, my hypothesis is that conservatives or people to the right are much more immune to peer pressure for either reason of being less intelligent or being weird/outcasts meaning they have less status to lose or are indifferent to status.    

Many of the dumb political conservatives will develop their views simply based upon common sense assumptions. For example, following 9/11, 7/7, the Rotherham pedophilia rings, the rape statistics in Sweden, the Paris Attacks, and Belgian Airport bombing  the conservative would take the simple common sense answer which is Islamic Immigration is bad mmmm K. The liberal on the other hand will see the Progressive Globalist establishment say not all Muslims and Religion of Peace TM. and will agree with the narrative in order to gain status and ignore common sense. The liberal then is able to gain some confirmation bias to confirm his absurd ideas in that the stupid heads below him disagree with him and take the common sense approach instead of the high status one. This is shown by the liberal tendency to name himself with adjectives which hold positive connotations such as Rational, Skeptical, Progressive, Freethinking, Liberal, etc. 

So it turns out that your either retarded or a weirdo who will never become genetically successful. Either that or liberals just like the surprises that being wrong all the time entails.  

An Introduction

Hey this is Serp here.

I just wanted to have a brief introduction in order to get this show on the road. I am a Traditional Catholic and Reactionary. I intend to use this blog to discuss Religion, Philosophy, Politics, Current Events, History, and Sociology from my point of view. I just wanted to define my positions as they exist in May 2016 in order for the readers to understand from where these views come from.

Issues within the Catholic Church

Obviously there is an immense ongoing crisis within the Roman Catholic Church that has emerged in the wake of Second Vatican Council and the Liturgical Reforms of Paul VI. As a Traditional Catholic laymen, my opinion is that Vatican II is a valid council and that the Novus Ordo is a valid and legal form of the Mass. Vatican II was unnecessary and  was intentionally written in a very confusing manner in order for Liberals and Modernists to read what they want into it. In the wake of the Council, under the weak leadership of Paul VI and to a lesser extent John Paul II, these liberal bishops, priests, religious, and laypeople were then able to get away with murder by using the council as a justification for introducing error, novelty, and indifference. These revolutionaries caused a major crisis by providing the laypeople with errors and a skin deep spiritual life as expressed often by Masses where liturgical abuse is rife. This has caused the laity to become largely indifferent to the destiny of their eternal souls resulting in widespread confusion, indifference and apostasy. Conversely these Liberals have fostered a subculture of gay priests which by its very nature lead to the pederasty scandals.

The Novus Ordo

My opinion on the Novus Ordo Mass is that it is inferior to the traditional Roman Rite. Despite this it is valid and totally licit. I myself attend the Novus Ordo, out of obligation. I believe that Catholics cannot pick and choose whether or not if they attend Mass on Sunday. If a Catholic does not have a traditional Mass they can attend on Sunday then they must attend the Novus Ordo. Not doing so is being a Cafeteria Catholic of the highest order and essentially rejecting the Third Commandment. It should be noted that the 1962 Missal in use by most traditionalists is in fact a stepping stone towards the Novus Ordo Missal of 1969 and is inferior to the Missal published prior to 1955.          

The SSPX

I am essentially neutral upon the SSPX. I am deeply sympathetic to the cause of Archbishop Lefebvre and the Society as well as Bishop Castro de Mayer and do think they were largely miss treated. Nonetheless, I am neutral for two reasons. First, because I actually hold an opinion which is more liberal then theirs regarding the new Mass and the Council which is much closer to the position held by the FSSP. Secondly, I also think that the SSPX is largely responsible for the scale and growth of Indult movement within the Church. I think that this point is largely academic now as the Society has the legally recognized right to hear confessions and conduct weddings.


The foundation of the State and its purpose

I reject the Enlightenment. I view modern western republics/democracy as essentially unworkable and the main basis behind the current crisis within western society. I think that the secularism is similarly unworkable, and that the social contract theory is a thoroughly insufficient justification of the powers of the state, and that the state ultimately gains its authority from the mandate of God. As such I see Monarchy and Aristocratic Republics as vastly superior forms of government to those which the west operatives under now. At the same time I realize that creating these forms of government is essentially impossible at this current state and time and support pragmatic means in the short term.  

Race 

This is obviously going to be one of the most controversial and the limiting of viewership on my blog. I believe that all human beings have a rational soul and should be converted to the Catholic Faith in order to have their eternal soul saved from the fires of Hell. I also believe that humans beings have a great genetic diversity which is obviously expressed in a very clear subspeciesization which are called races. As such, nature does not do equals and the races have differences in intelligence which has an immense impact upon the societies in which they exist. I think that these differences have developed over hundreds upon thousands of years, but are greatly influenced by the culture in which they exist. As such cultures which hold more relaxed morals naturally tend to lead to lower intelligence people with violent societies. Conversely, the Christian faith with its high morals naturally leads to a closer perfection of society morally which leads to a higher stock of men. Ultimately in the short term such as in a few generations genes matter a great deal more in the general quality of a society, but in the long term such as centuries and millenniums morals and religions ultimately determine the nature of a people.        


The JQ

The Jewish people are disproportionately the enemies of Christ. This is an undeniable truth, but it must always be remembered that Christ died for all mankind and that the Jews just as every people are redeemed by the Blood of Christ in the waters of Baptism.