An Introduction

Hey this is Serp here.

I just wanted to have a brief introduction in order to get this show on the road. I am a Traditional Catholic and Reactionary. I intend to use this blog to discuss Religion, Philosophy, Politics, Current Events, History, and Sociology from my point of view. I just wanted to define my positions as they exist in May 2016 in order for the readers to understand from where these views come from.

Issues within the Catholic Church

Obviously there is an immense ongoing crisis within the Roman Catholic Church that has emerged in the wake of Second Vatican Council and the Liturgical Reforms of Paul VI. As a Traditional Catholic laymen, my opinion is that Vatican II is a valid council and that the Novus Ordo is a valid and legal form of the Mass. Vatican II was unnecessary and  was intentionally written in a very confusing manner in order for Liberals and Modernists to read what they want into it. In the wake of the Council, under the weak leadership of Paul VI and to a lesser extent John Paul II, these liberal bishops, priests, religious, and laypeople were then able to get away with murder by using the council as a justification for introducing error, novelty, and indifference. These revolutionaries caused a major crisis by providing the laypeople with errors and a skin deep spiritual life as expressed often by Masses where liturgical abuse is rife. This has caused the laity to become largely indifferent to the destiny of their eternal souls resulting in widespread confusion, indifference and apostasy. Conversely these Liberals have fostered a subculture of gay priests which by its very nature lead to the pederasty scandals.

The Novus Ordo

My opinion on the Novus Ordo Mass is that it is inferior to the traditional Roman Rite. Despite this it is valid and totally licit. I myself attend the Novus Ordo, out of obligation. I believe that Catholics cannot pick and choose whether or not if they attend Mass on Sunday. If a Catholic does not have a traditional Mass they can attend on Sunday then they must attend the Novus Ordo. Not doing so is being a Cafeteria Catholic of the highest order and essentially rejecting the Third Commandment. It should be noted that the 1962 Missal in use by most traditionalists is in fact a stepping stone towards the Novus Ordo Missal of 1969 and is inferior to the Missal published prior to 1955.          

The SSPX

I am essentially neutral upon the SSPX. I am deeply sympathetic to the cause of Archbishop Lefebvre and the Society as well as Bishop Castro de Mayer and do think they were largely miss treated. Nonetheless, I am neutral for two reasons. First, because I actually hold an opinion which is more liberal then theirs regarding the new Mass and the Council which is much closer to the position held by the FSSP. Secondly, I also think that the SSPX is largely responsible for the scale and growth of Indult movement within the Church. I think that this point is largely academic now as the Society has the legally recognized right to hear confessions and conduct weddings.


The foundation of the State and its purpose

I reject the Enlightenment. I view modern western republics/democracy as essentially unworkable and the main basis behind the current crisis within western society. I think that the secularism is similarly unworkable, and that the social contract theory is a thoroughly insufficient justification of the powers of the state, and that the state ultimately gains its authority from the mandate of God. As such I see Monarchy and Aristocratic Republics as vastly superior forms of government to those which the west operatives under now. At the same time I realize that creating these forms of government is essentially impossible at this current state and time and support pragmatic means in the short term.  

Race 

This is obviously going to be one of the most controversial and the limiting of viewership on my blog. I believe that all human beings have a rational soul and should be converted to the Catholic Faith in order to have their eternal soul saved from the fires of Hell. I also believe that humans beings have a great genetic diversity which is obviously expressed in a very clear subspeciesization which are called races. As such, nature does not do equals and the races have differences in intelligence which has an immense impact upon the societies in which they exist. I think that these differences have developed over hundreds upon thousands of years, but are greatly influenced by the culture in which they exist. As such cultures which hold more relaxed morals naturally tend to lead to lower intelligence people with violent societies. Conversely, the Christian faith with its high morals naturally leads to a closer perfection of society morally which leads to a higher stock of men. Ultimately in the short term such as in a few generations genes matter a great deal more in the general quality of a society, but in the long term such as centuries and millenniums morals and religions ultimately determine the nature of a people.        


The JQ

The Jewish people are disproportionately the enemies of Christ. This is an undeniable truth, but it must always be remembered that Christ died for all mankind and that the Jews just as every people are redeemed by the Blood of Christ in the waters of Baptism.