Nazis, Fascists, Communists and the Political Spectrum

I seldom post on this blog, but I wanted to comment on this subject, after seeing a debate between Vox Day and Andrew Anglin as well as recent video on Fascism by Charles Coulombe. I want to cover the concept of the political spectrum, the concept of Fascism, and the Leftness of Marxist Leninism.

Left vs Right

The concept of Left Wing and Right Wing is dumb. nuff said...

Just kidding, but seriously it makes no real sense. Its defined in economic terms as Capitalism vs Socialism. If that were true every country prior to 1991 would be a radical Leftist country. Its defined as Enlightenment vs Anti-Enlightenment, but what does that even mean? Would that mean slavery is left wing? DEMS ARE THE REAL RACISTS! The best possible definition is essentially that Left is the belief in attempting to create universal human equality possible at any one point in time, and the Right is a negative definition of opposing achieving universal human equality or interchangeability  in any one area at any one time. In this definition, Right and Left is a completely arbitrary definition that can only be understood within history context. In American history then, in 1960 it was rejecting the equality of races in intellectual intelligence. In 1980, it was that women and men are different. In 2000, it was marriage having a coherent definition. Now its that citizenship as something than exists.  

Currently, then the Left in America is a force which wants to destroy any sense of American identity through the use Multinational Corporations. Any advocacy for Socialism is now de facto Right wing, because socialism if done for empowerment of one group over another is right wing, So workers solidarity is right wing because it opposes the lazy who depend upon welfare (often those who have more melanin). So Trump standing up for the workers and against multi-nationals is right wing, because right wing is a negative term which defines those who stand against the left wing at any one point in time. 

Fascism as a Historical Construct

There is no coherent definition of Fascism. The only meaningful definition is the colloquial definition which is: a holder of an opinion a self described leftist opposes. Because I have heard the following people be described as Fascists: Sun Yat-sen, Augusto Pinochet, Suharto, Ferdinand Marcos, Mohammad Rezā Pahlavi, Adolf Hitler, Margret Thatcher, Benito Mussolini, Benjamin Netanyahu, Plutarco Elías Calles, Donald Trump, Josip Broz Tito, Francisco Franco, and Hillary Clinton. In that sense its everybody and their dog, and their dog's dog. In the University system its a lump all term for any states which can be associated with Nazi Germany which existed in the 1930s/40s in Europe. The most honest and coherent definition would be a political system with a centralized single party state which has a mixed economy which leans towards socialism and is very nationalist in both ideology and practice. So by that definition the bad guys from WW2 as well as Baathists would be Fascist. Now obviously, Fascism as it now exists is an inherently pejorative term, but a nationalist single party state with a corporatism model of socialism seems to be a workable definition. 

Nazism/National Socialism 

I don't like Hitler, and I don't like German National Socialism or Nazism. We are told that it is the Platonic Form of Evil, and it was bad for sure, but it is one bad regime among many in the vast annuals of history. Something that is often forgotten though is that Historical Nazism was extremely pragmatic. They never constructed a constitution, but used the Weimar constitution in emergency powers mode the whole time. Their ideology considered Russians subhuman, and allied with the South Slavs. Hitler hated the French and admired Muslim Arabs. Their whole ideology was one of convenience, and is completely incoherent. At one point they had a heavy contingent of  Command Economists holding prominent positions, who were fucking decimated, by the way, when it became apparent that ruling the country would work better if they had support from industrial capitalists and they settled on a mixed market. Nazism is now associated with anything right wing by self proclaimed leftists, but is now integrally connected to both Pan-White Racial Nationalism.  This is all the fault of one man.

 

George Lincoln Rockwell created a Pan-White Racial Nationalist movement in the United States associated with Nazism for shock power. His movement was basically a parody of the American Black Civil Rights movement happening simultaneously. He was succeeded by William Luther Pierce who continued the movement through the collapse of Southern resistance to the rise of Black poltical power.  This meant that all Pan-White Racial Nationalism would become associated with this movement. This movement begin calling itself White Nationalism and is and was extremely working class. As such it grows though disaffected whites with average or slightly below average intelligence and was not really interested in its image. As such, in the popular mindset Nazism is associated with this movement, and this movement has nothing to do with it. This is a horrible thing for two reasons. 1. The real Nazis were not Pan White Nationalists at all, and were Nordicists who didn't care about the White Race and European civilization. 2. This means that the war crimes of the Nazis in the Second World War are now due to Pan White Nationalism in the normies mind. Well I don't think that its necessary to constantly distance yourself from Nazism from a broken record. Its retarded that if you think that America should remain a White majority nation that in the minds of normies that equals wantonly destroying Polish and Czech towns, and I have as much sympathies for the Nazis that I do for the Soviets. 

Italian Fascism 

The catch all term of Fascism receives its name from a group of Italians who predated the Nazis. The Italian Fascists were far different then their Nazi counterparts. The Germans were ethnic nationalists, while the Italians were Civic Nationalists who accepted Jews. Don't believe me? Then check out the American Black Shirts. True Fascism was much more grounded than its German counterpart, and talked little of Hyperboreans and Aryans, yet far less pragmatic. The Italian system had more to its ideology, being a Nationalist form of Revolutionary Socialism in the understanding of a Corporatist economic system. This was the system which the other so called Fascist parties base themselves, as it was far more thought out as an ideology. 

Francoism and the Falange 

The third prominent example of Fascism given is always Spain under Franco. While the Falange were similar to the Italian Fascists. They again were not nordicists like the Nazis but Catholic civic Nationalists, and just wanted the Jews to convert to Catholicism and be Spanish... (The historical answer to the Jewish question). It is often forgotten that the Falange were just one supporter of the cause of the Nationalist in the Civil War among many. Once Franco took power, he gradually distanced himself from the Falange, especially after their brand of Socialism failed...  (A brand of Socialism which is doubled in no true Scotsmanship, because the self declared Left likes to play lip service to socialism, and because it failed).

One thing you notice is that the Italians were the ones people ripped off and the Germans were the outliers. Secondly there are technically only 4 Fascist parties to take power without being imposed by outside powers being Italy, Germany, Greece and Romania. And Greece was an allied power in the war...

Marxism Leninism in Power

  

So you have a country which is an imperialist power annexing numerous states and making many others its puppet states. It aggressively tries to destroy the national identities of its minorities by promoting the culture of the ethnic majority. Its official doctrine is that only the educated elite can effectively rule a country, while simultaneously advocating for the working class. It supports traditional gender roles while claiming to empower women, and aggressively enforces anti-sodomy laws. Well that's the Soviet Union post Lenin.  Almost to a man, every Marxist Leninist nation was far to the "right" on every issue except many were Anti-religious thing.Yet almost every person you meet on the street who claims to be a commie is a fucking filthy animal. Basically Revolutionary Socialism as a movement which developed in the aftermath of the French Revolution and 1848 and is effectively dead post 1991 was a Millennialist pseudo religious idea. It's completely feels over reals. Anarchist, Left Communists, and Trotskyist essentially believe that magic will just happen and a revolution will spontaneously over take the world. There is truth to the no true Scotsman of real Communism has never been tried, and because real communism is completely impossible. While the people which are self identified leftists today were for the most part made up communists in Europe back in the day as soon as they took power none of their ideas worked. If you look at Soviet History rather closely they tried all these stupid Weimar  internationalist and free love bullshit and it failed then Stalin obliterated all that horseshit.

Also keep in mind there has always been working class guys who don't wanna deal with that stupid Capitalist bullshit. These guys had no tolerance for faggotary, and that is who Stalin supported and what almost every Communist country was like. So that means that under the meaningful definition of right vs left now Communism is right wing... And in the current historical context it is! Also once Stalin effectively industrialized Russia in lighting speed on the top of a mounds of bodies Communism became a worldwide movement for modernization and industrialization. Asian, African, and Middle Eastern communists while not nice guys don't like faggy bullshit at all.

So to reiterate Right wing can only exist in opposition to those who consider themselves to be Left. The Left is those who want to create the most possible equality or even interchangeability of peoples as possible and thus go against both the laws of nature and God.   

An Endorsement of Donald Trump or something like that.

In my life as a Millennial, I have lived through three presidencies those being Bill Clinton's, George Bush Jr's., and Barrack Obama's. At the beginning of this period the world seemed to be entering an age of unparalleled peace and prosperity. The United States was the unmatched Super Power who had triumphed from a 46 year long unofficial war of attrition with the Soviet Union to create a world which it could shape at its will. Never before had a single nation had so much power as the United States had had in the early 90's. Many believed that America had ushered in an Pax Americana where the Anglosphere cultural model would expand and usher in its civil freedoms and prosperity across the globe, Francis Fukuyama's so called End of History. This of course did not come to pass as it was impossible. The wealth, prosperity and freedom seen within the United States, Great Britain, and rest of the Anglosphere countries is cultural and bound within the people and history of those nations. For numerous reasons you cannot transform Russia, Somalia, or Iraq into New Zealand. You cannot create peace by molding other nations into the United States through cultural erosion. This era of peace quickly faded into obscurity into the world and America you see today. It goes without saying that these last three presidents have been horrible and incompetent in such an aggressive way as to pull America back from its strength it had at the beginning of the 90's into a state which boarders on terminal decline.

The Man Slut President 1993-2001

To the uninitiated, Bill Clinton seems to have been a decent president who guided the country well, but was untested by the major problems which would create a great or terrible president when facing them. While Clinton did do some good in addressing rising crime and helping further the decline in violent crime initiated by the Drug War, (the so called racist system where intercity blacks are held to the same standards as whites) he would hurt America more then help it. Bill Clinton was more than any other president responsible for the rise of Globalism, Neo-Liberalism, and the decline of the American workforce. Bill Clinton signed into law and championed NAFTA, and the most favored trading partner status with the Chinese. While Reagan and Bush had begun Neo-Liberalism, Clinton put it on steroids and paved the way for the rapid deindustrialization of the Untied States which not just tears the jobs away from hard working Americans, destroys communities, and causes poverty, but makes the United States weak and a slave to the whims of the Globalist world plan. Clinton also oversaw the vast deregularization of  Wall Street and banking industry an act which would enable the usury which blossomed into the finical collapse of 2008/2009, from which the world is yet to recover. Clinton also continued the Cold War insanity of the American Empire despite the absence of the Soviet Union. These Foriegn wars serve little purpose for the American people, and in fact are counter to their interests as they create blowback (9/11), strengthens the globalist economy, ruins the lives people of other nations, grows the debt of the United States, and generally makes the world unsafer. In his private life Clinton has been notoriously surrounded by immense controversy as the most corrupt president in American history. The Clinton's have been of course involved in insider trading (Cattle Future Trading Scandal), Pyramid schemes (White Water Scandal), and the destruction of incriminating files (Filegate & Email Scandal). Clinton had the Monica Lewinsky scandal, but has been involved in numerous others surrounding around his sexual escapades including the most recent one involving likely pedophilia in the Lolita Express scandal. Most shocking of these scandals, are conspiratorial in nature, the death of White House Consul Vince Foster, and the possible high treason of trading secrets to the People's Republic of China for Campaign Contributions.

The Legacy President 2001-2009

I doubt George Bush II was as stupid as the left wing media made him out to be, but there is little doubt in one thing, everything he has in life was given to him by the power of his father. That being said the failures of the second Bush have been spoken from the highs of the mountain tops by the Liberal media so addressing them hear is some what redundant. That being said he reigned when the economic seeds laid by Clinton blossomed in the chaos which was the so called Great Recession. His intervention in the Great Recession and tax cuts without spending cuts greatly increased the debt burden of the federal government. The greatest failure of Bush's presidency was without a doubt the Invasion of Iraq. Iraq cannot be reshaped into Canada over night, this is obvious. The threat of Iraq as the future perpetrator of a 9/11 like attack with Weapons of Mass Destruction was of course ludicrous. The fruits of the Iraq war would not come into full spring until the presidency of his successor. 

The Affirmative Action President 2009-2016   

Obama's young life is shrouded in mystery and has prompted the Birther conspiracy theory movement. My guess for Obama's murky past is that it revels something not as sinister as being the illegitimate child of a communist or a closet Muslim, but something embarrassing. The embarrassing fact is that Obama is essentially an Affirmative Action president propelled forward by the Chicago political machine. Obama is an incompetent and petty man whose failures are greater than his predecessors. This has been obscured by the liberal media painting him in a much more favorable light than Bush. Obama has turned the Iraq war and foreign policy he inherited from Bush into something worse than a terrible war, he has turned it into a civilizational crisis. The interventions into Iraq, Syria, and Libya have created the Migrant Crisis something which threatens to destabilize the whole of Europe. Obama is a politically correct coward who cannot even call ISIS by its name the Islamic State. He has of course continued the failed economic polices of his predecessors which benefits only the Globalist elite, and puts the immense burden of ever increasing debt upon the average American. Obama has also helped in reigniting racial disharmony by stating that the thug Treyvon Martin could have been his son. In doing so he has tarnished the Oval Office even more than Bill Clinton did by not being the President of the nation at large (at least publicly) but the president of his ethnic group. Obama is further tarnishing the presidency by campaigning against Donald Trump as a sitting president something which is outside of established norms in American politics.

Hilldawg Rising   ?2016-2020/2024¿       

   Hilldawg is Death. Hilldawg is Chaos. Hilldawg is Decline. 

Hillary brings the culmination of the last few presidencies to a crescendo, the transition from stagnation into decline unto collapse.  With the passing the 1965 Immigration act the demographics of the United States have been damaged by the mass inflow of non-European immigration. This Immigration brings with it an increase in crime, social alienation, and  easy victories for the Democratic party which uses the promise of welfare to bribe these immigrants into electing them. Hillary Clinton offers the most radical immigration policy in American history if not world history. What little stands in the way of Central American immigration now will be abolished and amnesity will be given away to all. The Republican party will never be able to acquire the White House ever again, and the United States will be transformed into a single party state. The Southwest will be populated with Central American migrants so fast that a urban conflict will likely develop resembling The Troubles in Northern Ireland with Mexican first and second immigrants using urban terrorism in an attempt to force the United States ceding the Southwest to Mexico. Hillary will also dump Muslims migrants all over America enabling mass rape and terrorism which is being seen in Europe. 

Hillary will continue the Globalist Economics of her husband and predecessors which will strip away jobs and make America a slave to the globalist game plan. She will continue the astronomic spending of the welfare system and possibly increase it leading to higher and higher levels of debt aided by increased taxes on corporations pushing America even further right on the Laffer Curve putting the nation into a unrecoverable economic position. This position will cause a chain of events which will usher in a never ending trap leading to the defaulting of the United States Federal Governments's debt. Once the United States defaults from its debt it will become completely incapable of recovering because it will have no manufacturing base from which to base its recovery from. After all what happens to nation which is an import dependent economy when it can no longer buy those imports? 

In the immediate future Hillary would fight the wars for Israel in the most haphazard way imaginable she is after all a hawk and the Neo-Cons are jumping the GOP ship for her. She has shown herself to be incredibly inept in foreign affairs as evidenced by Benghazi and the Libya in general. My guess is that once the United States enters an Economic meltdown the armed forces will be drastically cutback. This cutback will actualized as a rapid withdrawal from the immense number of overseas bases the Untied States currently has. This withdrawal will greatly destabilize East Asia, the Middle East, and Europe leading to a power vacuum.

The most important and powerful branch of the American Government is the Supreme Court. Originally, I supported Cruz over Trump due to the immense importance of Supreme Court Justice appointments as Cruz seemed more trustworthy in this department then Trump during the heat of the primaries. That point aside. If Hillary wins we have a 5/9 Liberal Court which will vote for Pozz on day one. In the next 4 to 8 years Kennedy, Ginsburg, and Breyer are likely to die leaving Hillary a 6/9 court, and conversely Trump a 7/9 court. Of Course, as I predicted above a second Clinton presidency would result in a single party state meaning that the Supreme Court would be permanently lost. With a court permanently lost to the cult of Dildotech, the social ills allowed to destroy the nation will move beyond Aberrosexuality and Abortion into the Abolition of the First and Second amendments. I believe the order of rights lost will be such: Religious Schools and Hospitals as well as Homeschooling will abolished, Followed by Tax Exemption (once Tax Exemption is revoked this will mean the Federal Government will shut down Churches at will as the IRS will be able to persecute Church Leaders just as it persecuted David Duke and the Tea Party movement), then the next will be hate speech and Holocaust Denial laws, ending with the gradual erosion of the Second Amendment.

I don't understand why RamzPaul is laughing about the possible growth of the "Alt-Right" in the above video. Doesn't he realize that a Clinton Presidency means that he will go to Prison? What use does the (((SPLC))) have other than providing a list for a purge on the day the First Amendment gets white outed from the Constitution? I could see the whole hate list of the (((SPLC))) from Don Black to Michael Matt being fined or imprisoned. 

Trump the man 

Sorry to pop your bubble, but Trump is not an angel or the best choice for president for social conservatives/paleo-conservatives. Trump's commitment to Social Conservatism is likely nothing less than skin deep as he has changed his party 5 times. In fact Trump once ran for president in 2000 under the Reform party. Its very likely that Trump has not converted to Conservative values, and is simply fanning them to get elected. What does this mean? Well if Trump wins the Republican Party could abandon Social Conservatism, and this is why originally I supported Cruz over and above Trump, but Trump has since stated his possible Supreme Court picks which are quite good and he seems that he will compromise here to be elected on the Republican ticket. If you look at Trump's run under the Reform party you see that Trump has not changed on a lot of issues most notably Protectionism and Immigration sanity. I think that Mr. Trump has quite wisely chosen the Republican Party to advance his goals as the Republican Party's primary was less rigged than the Democratic's Party's as well as the Republican constituency to more openness to outsiders and lied or fanned Conservatism and Christianity in order to be succeed in the party's primary.

 While I doubt it it is possible that Trump is truly an egomaniac who wants to be elected simply for the glory of the White House. (This does seem unlikely as Trump has lost a great deal by running.) Which brings another downside to Trump in that his presidency has become vehicle for the increasing vulgarness of social discourse. Trump was a Reality TV star and in his speeches he talks in the manner of a Reality TV star, vulgar and blunt. Trump symbolizes the decline of the United States and resembles ironically a Latin American politician in the image he has made for himself. This image is a flamboyant tough guy who speaks in the manner of the average man. Trump does not pose himself as a man of integrity, intelligence, or of the Church but as a commodity for the lowest common denominator.

Trump is also not a good man under the standards of Catholic Church. Trump has committed adultery and bragged about it, and has used his wealth and power in order to marry women much younger than him who are models. He is unrepentant for his sins and is immensely ignorant of Christianity and lies about his faith in such a transparent matter that any Christmas and Easter Christian with an IQ above 75 can see it. He has gone bankrupt 3 times and is entangled with Trump University case. There are even allegations that he has connections with the Mob. He could have even cheated on his taxes too!!! 

Trump could also be a paper tiger. People forget that he is a complete greenhorn in politics and has never held public office. He also faces something which almost any politician would perceive as a nightmare, his own party does not support him. Much of the establishment is still backbiting him now at the point when it is suicide to do so, and one can only imagine what would happen if he is incompetent upon entering office and the whole of the Republican Party abandons him leaving completely in the cold. He also faces the difficulty of running against Hillary's massive industry of financial support with the commitment not to use big business/Wallstreet campaign money. As well as picking a VP candidate who not just support the establishment in the event of assassination or impeachment. Trump still faces an electoral college biased towards Hillary, and the high possibility of voter fraud as seen in Austria. His trading polices could preemptively trigger the economic collapse discussed above as well leading to a very low approval rate which would resemble that of Boris Yeltsin.  

The Last Hope

 

         

All this being said Trump is the only hope we have. He is the last thing standing in the way of America's epitaph. We have no choice, but to support him. He polices on trade, immigration, and foreign affairs will truly benefit America First. He has also punched Overton Window so hard in his stumpings that he is legitimately opening the door for public discourse to include Heresy. Jared Taylor is getting on TV again fam!!! He has crushed the Neo-Cons and pushing the remainder of the Jews into the Democratic party, and is reshaping the Republican party with a vast social movement into a party which supports American independence and Populism. Even if he does fail in the most miserable way imaginable he will hopefully leave us with two legacies one a 7/9 Supreme Court and two a wall on the boarder which cannot not be unbuilt.  

Look to the Skies, and See the Trumpian Rise

- Serp Kerp