I have heard that Conservatives have the tendency to like or do the same things over and over again. For example they will watch the same films over and over, stay loyal to a single band for decades, or eat at the same restaurant repeatedly. I know that this is certainly true of myself as I watch David Lynch's Dune like a dozen times a year, and play hundreds of hours of Paradox interactive games. Liberals in contrast supposedly tend to be much more exploratory and constantly trying something new. Maybe this is where the meme of an old boring fuddy duddy originates. I have noticed that the more Red pilled I became my assumptions matched reality. I know that confirmation bias is a powerful drug that's entirety subjective, but it seemed lefty Serp had a higher error in his predictions then righty Serp now does. I wonder if liberals like to be surprised by always being wrong.
But anyway to the main point, being an evil, racist, Nazi SOB I find myself making an assumption and then researching the point only to be greatly surprised by the immense accuracy of that assumption. Case in point, earlier I was scrolling down the Facebook when I saw a video of a plastic wheel barrow in Africa used for transporting water. This wheel barrow is the Hippo water roller.
The Hippo water roller is a wheel barrow with a large plastic barrel of water as a wheel. The roller allows women and children in Sub Saharan Africa transporting water from rivers and lakes to their homes to carry much more water faster then they would of had carrying it the traditional way, on the head. Upon watching this video my immediate reaction was to assume that whites in the west invented this. I immediately looked the Hippo roller up on google to check, and to my non-surprise it was in fact made by whites. Two Boers in South Africa, Pettie Petzer and Johan Jonker, as a matter of fact. The comment actually made me feel guilty as if I was picking on a retard. Some commentators said "hey guess what Africans have finally invented the wheel" my assumption was even edger "hey look some whites invented the wheel for the Africans".
Besides the sobering fact that whites who come up with the simplest of ideas are doing more for Africa then Sub-Saharans are doing for themselves is the jarring nature of your own confirmation bias. Its just mind boggling. There is of course the aids to checking out your assumptions such as the cleverly named Coincidence Detector which highlights Jewish Surnames in HTML.
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/coincidence-detector/hldnghbakgkgeocjllocmpobpppkfepo?hl=en-US
Besides the sobering fact that whites who come up with the simplest of ideas are doing more for Africa then Sub-Saharans are doing for themselves is the jarring nature of your own confirmation bias. Its just mind boggling. There is of course the aids to checking out your assumptions such as the cleverly named Coincidence Detector which highlights Jewish Surnames in HTML.
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/coincidence-detector/hldnghbakgkgeocjllocmpobpppkfepo?hl=en-US
Once you download that app and check out the Neo-Conservative or Trotskyist Wikipedia pages and see assumption after assumption confirmed its only nature to wonder how is the normal guy not smart enough to get this. How is the average man not able to just simply not notice what's right in front of his face? Why do Liberals masquerade as the intelligent ones when every assumption and every prediction they have ever made is wrong?
A great example of a liberal being monumentally wrong is the video of the Amazing Atheist examining the Five Proofs of the existence of God of Saint Thomas Aquinas.
A great example of a liberal being monumentally wrong is the video of the Amazing Atheist examining the Five Proofs of the existence of God of Saint Thomas Aquinas.
The immense hubris at work here is mind boggling. The Amazing Atheist, who happens to be a high school dropout, believes that he has thoroughly debunked Saint Thomas Aquinas within a 15 minute youtube video. Anyone who has a glimmer of an understanding of Saint Thomas, Aristotle, or Scholasticism at large can see almost immediately that the Amazing Atheist has absolutely no idea of what he is talking about. He is so ignorant of the topic that he is unable to understand the fourth proof or The Argument from Degree in any detail. He simply does not even know what a Universal is. Yet he was so confident of his own intelligence that he made this video and is or at least was probably proud of it (its still hosted upon his official account and not mirrored). He did not even think to look up or read any basic introduction to Saint Thomas's work in a philosophical encyclopedia book, it seems he just free balled it.
I think it becomes clearly evident when watching this video that liberals have a low understanding of what the right actually believes and why. They have so much disdain for the right they look upon understanding it as literally below them. A good example of this is the following video by Peace House.
I think it becomes clearly evident when watching this video that liberals have a low understanding of what the right actually believes and why. They have so much disdain for the right they look upon understanding it as literally below them. A good example of this is the following video by Peace House.
The presenters make immense errors upon the policies of Donald Trump which could have been easily fixed by the fifteen minutes which it takes to read the Wikipedia page of Donald Trump. Yet they make these errors because they refuse to understand the policies Trump wants because that is beneath them, the enlightened progressives. To them Trump is an evil capitalist who simply is exploiting the hatred of stupid rednecks. Nothing more, nothing less. The leftist inability to understand the right as well the narrowness of their moral compass is examined in depth in the Righteous Mind by Jonathan Haidt.
My hypothesis is that most outspoken liberals have average to moderately above average intelligence and gravitate towards opinions which have high prestige. The ideas which have high prestige are of course the ideas of the ruling class which in the modern Occident is the ideology of Progressive Globalism and the universal equality of all human beings. These people of middle level intelligence then out of the desire to look intelligent and fit into society become liberals. The high status that teachers in high schools and universities as well as the media and celebrities which are overwhelmingly liberal doesn't help this trend either.
Conversely, my hypothesis is that conservatives or people to the right are much more immune to peer pressure for either reason of being less intelligent or being weird/outcasts meaning they have less status to lose or are indifferent to status.
Many of the dumb political conservatives will develop their views simply based upon common sense assumptions. For example, following 9/11, 7/7, the Rotherham pedophilia rings, the rape statistics in Sweden, the Paris Attacks, and Belgian Airport bombing the conservative would take the simple common sense answer which is Islamic Immigration is bad mmmm K. The liberal on the other hand will see the Progressive Globalist establishment say not all Muslims and Religion of Peace TM. and will agree with the narrative in order to gain status and ignore common sense. The liberal then is able to gain some confirmation bias to confirm his absurd ideas in that the stupid heads below him disagree with him and take the common sense approach instead of the high status one. This is shown by the liberal tendency to name himself with adjectives which hold positive connotations such as Rational, Skeptical, Progressive, Freethinking, Liberal, etc.
So it turns out that your either retarded or a weirdo who will never become genetically successful. Either that or liberals just like the surprises that being wrong all the time entails.
No comments:
Post a Comment