Nazis, Fascists, Communists and the Political Spectrum

I seldom post on this blog, but I wanted to comment on this subject, after seeing a debate between Vox Day and Andrew Anglin as well as recent video on Fascism by Charles Coulombe. I want to cover the concept of the political spectrum, the concept of Fascism, and the Leftness of Marxist Leninism.

Left vs Right

The concept of Left Wing and Right Wing is dumb. nuff said...

Just kidding, but seriously it makes no real sense. Its defined in economic terms as Capitalism vs Socialism. If that were true every country prior to 1991 would be a radical Leftist country. Its defined as Enlightenment vs Anti-Enlightenment, but what does that even mean? Would that mean slavery is left wing? DEMS ARE THE REAL RACISTS! The best possible definition is essentially that Left is the belief in attempting to create universal human equality possible at any one point in time, and the Right is a negative definition of opposing achieving universal human equality or interchangeability  in any one area at any one time. In this definition, Right and Left is a completely arbitrary definition that can only be understood within history context. In American history then, in 1960 it was rejecting the equality of races in intellectual intelligence. In 1980, it was that women and men are different. In 2000, it was marriage having a coherent definition. Now its that citizenship as something than exists.  

Currently, then the Left in America is a force which wants to destroy any sense of American identity through the use Multinational Corporations. Any advocacy for Socialism is now de facto Right wing, because socialism if done for empowerment of one group over another is right wing, So workers solidarity is right wing because it opposes the lazy who depend upon welfare (often those who have more melanin). So Trump standing up for the workers and against multi-nationals is right wing, because right wing is a negative term which defines those who stand against the left wing at any one point in time. 

Fascism as a Historical Construct

There is no coherent definition of Fascism. The only meaningful definition is the colloquial definition which is: a holder of an opinion a self described leftist opposes. Because I have heard the following people be described as Fascists: Sun Yat-sen, Augusto Pinochet, Suharto, Ferdinand Marcos, Mohammad Rezā Pahlavi, Adolf Hitler, Margret Thatcher, Benito Mussolini, Benjamin Netanyahu, Plutarco Elías Calles, Donald Trump, Josip Broz Tito, Francisco Franco, and Hillary Clinton. In that sense its everybody and their dog, and their dog's dog. In the University system its a lump all term for any states which can be associated with Nazi Germany which existed in the 1930s/40s in Europe. The most honest and coherent definition would be a political system with a centralized single party state which has a mixed economy which leans towards socialism and is very nationalist in both ideology and practice. So by that definition the bad guys from WW2 as well as Baathists would be Fascist. Now obviously, Fascism as it now exists is an inherently pejorative term, but a nationalist single party state with a corporatism model of socialism seems to be a workable definition. 

Nazism/National Socialism 

I don't like Hitler, and I don't like German National Socialism or Nazism. We are told that it is the Platonic Form of Evil, and it was bad for sure, but it is one bad regime among many in the vast annuals of history. Something that is often forgotten though is that Historical Nazism was extremely pragmatic. They never constructed a constitution, but used the Weimar constitution in emergency powers mode the whole time. Their ideology considered Russians subhuman, and allied with the South Slavs. Hitler hated the French and admired Muslim Arabs. Their whole ideology was one of convenience, and is completely incoherent. At one point they had a heavy contingent of  Command Economists holding prominent positions, who were fucking decimated, by the way, when it became apparent that ruling the country would work better if they had support from industrial capitalists and they settled on a mixed market. Nazism is now associated with anything right wing by self proclaimed leftists, but is now integrally connected to both Pan-White Racial Nationalism.  This is all the fault of one man.

 

George Lincoln Rockwell created a Pan-White Racial Nationalist movement in the United States associated with Nazism for shock power. His movement was basically a parody of the American Black Civil Rights movement happening simultaneously. He was succeeded by William Luther Pierce who continued the movement through the collapse of Southern resistance to the rise of Black poltical power.  This meant that all Pan-White Racial Nationalism would become associated with this movement. This movement begin calling itself White Nationalism and is and was extremely working class. As such it grows though disaffected whites with average or slightly below average intelligence and was not really interested in its image. As such, in the popular mindset Nazism is associated with this movement, and this movement has nothing to do with it. This is a horrible thing for two reasons. 1. The real Nazis were not Pan White Nationalists at all, and were Nordicists who didn't care about the White Race and European civilization. 2. This means that the war crimes of the Nazis in the Second World War are now due to Pan White Nationalism in the normies mind. Well I don't think that its necessary to constantly distance yourself from Nazism from a broken record. Its retarded that if you think that America should remain a White majority nation that in the minds of normies that equals wantonly destroying Polish and Czech towns, and I have as much sympathies for the Nazis that I do for the Soviets. 

Italian Fascism 

The catch all term of Fascism receives its name from a group of Italians who predated the Nazis. The Italian Fascists were far different then their Nazi counterparts. The Germans were ethnic nationalists, while the Italians were Civic Nationalists who accepted Jews. Don't believe me? Then check out the American Black Shirts. True Fascism was much more grounded than its German counterpart, and talked little of Hyperboreans and Aryans, yet far less pragmatic. The Italian system had more to its ideology, being a Nationalist form of Revolutionary Socialism in the understanding of a Corporatist economic system. This was the system which the other so called Fascist parties base themselves, as it was far more thought out as an ideology. 

Francoism and the Falange 

The third prominent example of Fascism given is always Spain under Franco. While the Falange were similar to the Italian Fascists. They again were not nordicists like the Nazis but Catholic civic Nationalists, and just wanted the Jews to convert to Catholicism and be Spanish... (The historical answer to the Jewish question). It is often forgotten that the Falange were just one supporter of the cause of the Nationalist in the Civil War among many. Once Franco took power, he gradually distanced himself from the Falange, especially after their brand of Socialism failed...  (A brand of Socialism which is doubled in no true Scotsmanship, because the self declared Left likes to play lip service to socialism, and because it failed).

One thing you notice is that the Italians were the ones people ripped off and the Germans were the outliers. Secondly there are technically only 4 Fascist parties to take power without being imposed by outside powers being Italy, Germany, Greece and Romania. And Greece was an allied power in the war...

Marxism Leninism in Power

  

So you have a country which is an imperialist power annexing numerous states and making many others its puppet states. It aggressively tries to destroy the national identities of its minorities by promoting the culture of the ethnic majority. Its official doctrine is that only the educated elite can effectively rule a country, while simultaneously advocating for the working class. It supports traditional gender roles while claiming to empower women, and aggressively enforces anti-sodomy laws. Well that's the Soviet Union post Lenin.  Almost to a man, every Marxist Leninist nation was far to the "right" on every issue except many were Anti-religious thing.Yet almost every person you meet on the street who claims to be a commie is a fucking filthy animal. Basically Revolutionary Socialism as a movement which developed in the aftermath of the French Revolution and 1848 and is effectively dead post 1991 was a Millennialist pseudo religious idea. It's completely feels over reals. Anarchist, Left Communists, and Trotskyist essentially believe that magic will just happen and a revolution will spontaneously over take the world. There is truth to the no true Scotsman of real Communism has never been tried, and because real communism is completely impossible. While the people which are self identified leftists today were for the most part made up communists in Europe back in the day as soon as they took power none of their ideas worked. If you look at Soviet History rather closely they tried all these stupid Weimar  internationalist and free love bullshit and it failed then Stalin obliterated all that horseshit.

Also keep in mind there has always been working class guys who don't wanna deal with that stupid Capitalist bullshit. These guys had no tolerance for faggotary, and that is who Stalin supported and what almost every Communist country was like. So that means that under the meaningful definition of right vs left now Communism is right wing... And in the current historical context it is! Also once Stalin effectively industrialized Russia in lighting speed on the top of a mounds of bodies Communism became a worldwide movement for modernization and industrialization. Asian, African, and Middle Eastern communists while not nice guys don't like faggy bullshit at all.

So to reiterate Right wing can only exist in opposition to those who consider themselves to be Left. The Left is those who want to create the most possible equality or even interchangeability of peoples as possible and thus go against both the laws of nature and God.